Low resolution is a violation of human rights. Operating at below full cranial capacity is not good for anyone. There is no reason to stare at something all day long that does not have the detail of full reality that you are capable of perceiving. There is no reason to waste time observing some phenomenon that is not at complete quality, sine any deductions you make regarding that phenomenon will be limited by the resolution at which you can perceive it.

Low resolution is more than simply pixels on a screen. Resolution, like blocks on the screen, low when there are few blocks, and large when there are many infinitesimally smaller blocks. Digitally using small blocks one can approximate just about anything including smooth lines. Being forced to operate at a threshold where a smooth line does not appear smooth may very well be tolerable, however its within your rights to experience perfectly smooth lines. That you would, by lack of any choice of your own, be forced to be subjected to lines that aren’t actually smooth is beneath your natural abilities and rights as a human being.

The conundrum is not in fact obvious. Most are perfectly satisfied with the number of blocks they have been subjected to. Some pay more to get more bocks, others cannot afford more blocks and simply make due with the number that they have. Without all the blocks, you cannot however construct a complete picture no matter how hard one might try. To think I’m speaking of city blocks… is to miss the point thus far entirely. The parity is more analogous to lacking of fundamental capacity to BOTH share AND absorb information, through which resides what is taken for knowledge, such that you never receive all of the tools, and then fail to absorb the total truth.

The conundrum can not in complete be solved. The conundrum has been intact perpetual throughout evolution of societies of communication, and pre-dates computer resolution entirely.

The conundrum is part that people become use to the lines being drawn the way that they have been presented within their experience, that they fail to perceive how the lines actually are… that they would believe they are on the side of good while supporting such succinctly incomplete evils that the world presents them with, as wagons to clamber upon, offering a free ride to “wherever you need to go”… and via some only choice “your there”, not realizing the world is full of other possibility, that subscribing to a particular way is always at your doom, or peril, not because you should buy it, but because fear that if you don’t buy it that you won’t be left with any choice at all, they remove the natural alternative from reality by corrupting the entire system into a state of crippled dependence on some foreign alternative to true understanding of the world and its intricacies*

The conundrum is succinctly that unless you have the capacity to categorize all possible conclusions on your own, you will not necessarily be lead to the complete conclusion by anything that you are presented with by other people. The caveat that information presented is always information that is useful to other peoples low resolution ends and goals, which do not ultimately necessarily line up (at all) with ones own ultimate goals and ends, larger than life itself.

You can accuse the nuts and bolts of the wagon all day long, share infinite detail and depth about the operations of the wagon down to every square nut of detail possible. You can try to pick apart its operation and dissect it and expose it for what it really is. People will never want to hear anything is wrong with that wagon they so hopefully believe in. No matter what truth you turn up, people will turn away from the truth that the wagon is just a big pile of bolts. If you fail however to examine the wagon closely and with complete accuracy and detail to how it actually works, the wagon will simply fall apart…

You owe it to yourselves to know full resolution on the complete detail of every problem, and do what it takes to put in place your ultimate goals for the future. If you do not build complete goals, you will come to an incomplete end. You can only maintain a framework for so long before you expand beyond the capacities of that framework, and more detail and resolution, a more intricate solution is required than has been presented previously, or everything will fall apart, while some things destroy so much and deserve to have fallen apart so badly they should have never been created in the first place.

The striking example that people in becoming accustomed to a lower resolution will repeatedly pay to attain a higher resolution example is the perilous addiction that is the ends of societies, cultures, worlds, confining all possible future realities to a mere subset of what is to become in your dreams before. Its with their power that they represent and subtract from worlds within the reaches of their control, stealing whatever it is that they can grab from the unsuspecting victims they come across along the way, and then abruptly leaving, one way or another, nothing of what once remained…

not in any sacred or even remotely acceptable or fair way, but rather in the most underhanded and unbecoming way possible, using their increased capacities to enslave the seemingly lower resolution realities and worlds that are more in touch with the highest clarities of reality become tricked that the solutions and tricky details of some other culture were not in fact the benefit that they needed or deserved, however rich someone else might get off of their poor decision to choose a transient and incomplete solution, bullied beyond their capacities by less worthy dominator’s into falling for a parasitic non solution of lower resolution which is more often than not death.

It is not alone their fault that they lack the knowledge to understand their own undoing, even if you pretend they are doing it to themselves, the individual with power over the situation holds ultimately responsibility to the rights of every other individual, and must be held accountable, but possibly on account, that is paid to do the right thing, or otherwise forced or encouraged to, in so far that doing the right thing pays, which is more often than not inverse from the actual setup these scum put in place.

It is the lack of fight against what is presented as the inevitable solution to problems which ultimately causes more problems as these solutions were too incomplete, hasty, and unenlightened. Crude, but effective, imperfect but seemingly effective.

Is that the best you can do?
Is that the best you can get?
Is that the best you deserve?

No, no… No… but I know how you can get more out of reality…

I want 1$…. from you…. its still true, or all the corporate predators can eat you for all I care… I’m asking for a lot less than they steal from you. I find myself eager for apocalypse of mankind, the land of plenty, land of heroes protecting the weak, instead of this land of many, but few that do the right thing in fighting back against corruption, too afraid they’ll loose their spot in the “to be eaten” wagon to speak up and remove all doubt that they aren’t about to let you out. Life, you fight for it, on it’s side, or you fall, but that life is not necessarily powerful enough to defend itself without effort and dedication by people and evolution of new concepts and simpler less invasive solutions to modern problems.

To think that humanities petty desires count as life as much as the humble bee hit by a car is not even close to a question. It’s not the car that earned a right to exist that the bee did. Corporate solutions… suck. It that questions stand to change anything that you must question everything, however the sanctity of life itself must remain intact or there can be no more life at all. The little things that power life itself must be protected at all costs. Discarding can leave one in ruin, it is up to you to build strength and discard that which is destroying life yourself, and protect what cannot protect itself, keeping only viable solutions intact, not based on whether or not they are profitable, but whether or not they are the most complete solution or not, that its never worth wasting cash on an incomplete solution that is not evolving into a better one, while realizing its only your cash that can take you there, or not, you must demand the most using it!

* They start confining them before birth by what they are exposed to, or not exposed to, without any study of complete outcomes of all possibilities, not that any attempt to control it would lead to any better outcome, since all attempts to confine or otherwise domesticate end up eliminating useful characteristics and natural evolution itself from the system, will not stand against the test of time, merely that the information about various combinations and outcomes would be available for study by anyone who had the inclination to know the situation they are getting into, and that there are always alternatives to the government prescribed treatment of future minds, and that exposure must always be controlled so that there is actually an alternative.

Share |
  Support VidzBigger... Donate! $3 $5 $10 $50 $1000 ... Bigger