(beta).  YouTube for the extra wide screen!
compose new post
next post/next comment
previous post/previous comment
show/hide comments
go to top

Latest Updates: green RSS

  • admin 12:53 pm on October 30, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , green, , ,

    Its always been the bane of computers that you can’t move the mouse and click things with the actual mouse using code, as much as a “security risk” that would be, the fact that I have to manually repeatedly click the same things all the time and have no way to automate it is very irritating aspect of computing considering thats precisely what computers are best at. It seems like you would have to use a camera and a hacked mouse building a simulated human to actually click things the way it should have been built in the first place. Either that or just record the input stack and play components of it back when you touch the initial position again, or dual USB your mouse with the second one sending feedback back to the mouse about the current position (and ideally information about whats under it so that it know what signal to send back). If your reaching for a button it should detect that your reaching for it and click it before you get there. Its like every program is a game, and they don’t allow cheating when your using your every day applications either. What a waste of time for everyone! An infinite amount of wasted time adds up between each person wasting it. I constantly want to build one button that clicks 3 things. WHY are we locked into doing it the way it was designed? What if its poorly designed for most intricate tasks efficiently. I don’t know why people must think its a game and that they actually enjoy clicking or typing the same things over and over again. I think it would be relatively easy to get around with enough time & money. If I could never click or type a day in my entire life again, I wouldn’t, I would click and type almost an infinite amount of stuff to make it so I’d never have to do it again. I really don’t understand people. They have much money invested in keeping people locked into doing things a way thats inhuman and unnatural in the first place, with the false assumption that repetition is fun. Stare at this dial all day and click this button when it gets to 20. Do you seriously need to waste a human life doing that, instead of having that human clean up pollution for example. There are far more profitable activities that have nothing to do with making money by polluting the entire world so you have the only clean fish tank, and people actually support that type of behavior as well, blindly, but they do, standardize pollution as “acceptable level” and monopolize their caged industries by eliminating natural alternatives from not just marketplace, but from existing at all, leaving no choice except to fall into “the way things are” as its presented, but reality of the limiting situation lies in wait for all parties involved, whether they profit in the short term or not, problems don’t go away on their own, and hatred of the activities and practices of the past is inevitable, even if its still occurring today and considered “modern”. Most are invested in preserving the way things are no matter how twisted and wrong it might be. Selling tomorrow for a today that’s less and less worth living in, until it becomes impossible that pure beings exist, their very essence pollution, and as long as they’re still rich they’ll tell you that its the way it should be. Even if someone built a bot today, would they want to share it with everyone? I think almost the only way to do any sort of computing is inside a buffer that can be manipulated in any way imaginable. Its the difference between computing and television, but extrapolated to infinity and about ultimate freedom, but not through slavery. Then one might call it a game, whereas anything that impinges on the freedom of other entities isn’t. Just because you can enslave millions doesn’t mean you’ll profit from it. The worst type of slave is the one that believes in what they are a part of as being freedom, that creating more enslavement is never ultimately good for anyone. Enslave nature an it will stop producing its fruits for you. Enslave ants in pavement and they will stop working for you. Enslave yourself to a way of life and you will stop enjoying living. Keep thinking your right in spite and one day you’ll be wrong, have eaten all your friends and earth, and left in space alone.

  • admin 5:34 pm on August 19, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: green

    Playing all the wrong notes on purpose to encrypt the message, manifesting someone who can see through a mask of scarcity to the encrypted abundance. There is no way I’m giving anything away for free. I might give you the lock, and you have to find the key, or give you the key and you have to find the lock, but I’m not giving anything significant away for free. You still owe me for that key. I am masking all of abundance preventing it from slipping out there accidentally or into the wrong hands. If I could be convinced that there are “the right hands” out there, then it might be different and I might have something significant to give. But in the right hands, my message already broadcasts abundance, if you want anything you either have to solve the puzzle on your own, or pay me for it. I’m not gong to give you all the pieces you need to succeeds for nothing, but chances are you can’t succeed at everything I’m imagining without all of the investors either. One could argue that society fails to spot future innovators and fails to foster any desire to give back after they already take so much for nothing, and instead trains people to defend against the robbers who would only steal ideas and make them for their own since birth, but a society that trains the opposite is almost certainly robbing the youth. The first thing they teach kids is they are worth nothing compared to older people. I think this is inherently opposite. Whenever I give I always feel that I am being stolen from, and I learn to make sure it backfires if they try to implement it on their own. If you want to correct this, the method is obvious, that you must be completely fair or else you will only be my enemy. The following links might make me think that you deserve something of innate non encrypted value. The pieces I have are worth everything in this world, but you can’t have them unless the rich people give me all their money first so they don’t simply abuse and continue to take advantage for themselves, that it either stars fair or it doesn’t start at all, so all of the money in the world is my enemy. They would rather keep things as they are than give up what they have to get something better. This is why rich people both suck and ultimately don’t help the world at all except hurt the environment to make more money, because they fail to seek and pay innovators. I have no problem sharing things with people who deserve it, but through the internet one has to assume that the worst possible person in the world is also reading it, and why should they deserve free benefit? If other people make a lot of money on my intentions thats not fair to me to have nothing. I would rather not exist than give actual value away for less than its worth. I’m not going to sell out for any price short of infinity, but if I had more than nothing you might be on to getting something more significant. Anyone else want to start a new country where we can actually do new things? Then we can hold all of the locks, all of the keys, all of the abundance, and let it slip out there slowly when they need it enough to pay for it. Too bad 90% of the people interested in this are spies that would only bleed our technology dry, that we form our state with total freedom within, massively advanced technology, all done in secret. As I count I’ve given you two things. You can try to deduct what I’ve “taken” except I haven’t received anything, so you really can’t deduct anything. If I actually took your happiness and now had it for my own then I would agree with you, otherwise you still owe me for each idea. If thats not another thing I don’t know what is. You hold no emotional account with me. This is text. Any feeling, is you. Any money, is mine. If you read it, then you either owe me, or owe me to keep it secret.

    They try to play it that if they only give nothing it will frustrate the truth out of them, but in reality, if you give nothing, you will get nothing, when you could have had everything. If you’d rather have the world of today, ie: nothing when compared with everything, thats your prerogative to be fate less instead of fate more. If you want more it has to benefit me before it benefits you. I have to have extra money that I don’t know what the hell to do with before giving anything away for free, donations must exceed an acceptable threshold. You must turn my donate button green, yourself, by using it. That people do not care enough to cherish what is not already green is why green of this world ceases to be.