VidzBigger.com (beta).  YouTube for the extra wide screen!



c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Recent Updates RSS Hide threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • admin 2:48 pm on September 4, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    censorship within the digg community
    -Is digg is becoming too big for its own good? how can we further separate the meaningful users from the impulsive noobs.

    I see it all the time. Just minding my own business, scrolling through other peoples impressions of some big digg story and I come across a little grey bar sporting the text “show comment”. I almost always read said comment (boredom), and find myself somewhat frequently appalled by how good the comment actually was, and question if the people who voted it down even read and/or understood it. How often is it that the red thumbs down means “I’m too stupid to grasp this”?

    given ( X = “user is too stupid grasp it” ) the red thumb down:
    1 infrequently means X
    2 sometimes means X
    3 frequently means X
    4 oh yea b****? grasp this! (X)

    The digg community is completely self moderated, as most of you already know. For each comment, users can either give a thumbs up or thumbs down, and very rapidly many comments fall deep into the negatives. The question becomes, why? There seem to be three major reasons:

    a) uninformed person posts retarded remark
    b) informed person posts controversial remark
    c) everyone else was doing it

    1 I frequently mod down anything I disagree with
    2 sometimes I mod down comments I disagree with
    3 I never mod down anything simply because i disagree with it
    4 D is my answer, I pick D

    I have no qualms with blatantly false and easy-to-google-the-answer remarks being removed, but what about the comments that have some truth to them but are simply hard for you to swallow? Any comment that makes you think, enough where you realize you would have to challenge your beliefs in order to entertain it is more often than not red-thumbed out of existence. You will not find controversial comments on digg unless you go digging for them, and by then their score is something like -76.

    1 I feel like the comments section on digg should be my personal support forum for the internet
    2 My beliefs are made of stone
    3 My beliefs are made of liquid hot magma
    4 If its controversial, it’s obviously wrong

    The green thumb quickly becomes powerless. A comment that has any negatives will be pushed deeper and deeper very quickly by hoards of people who base what they think about the comment on the score it has already received. Unless you are very careful about what you say, do not even think about defending a comment that has received more than a few negatives, or you too will be moderated out of existence. So even the defenders are forced to censor themselves to be heard, and the real meat of the issue is cast aside.

    at what point is a comment beyond redemption?

    1 -1 to -4 diggs
    2 -5 to -9 diggs
    3 anything less than -10 diggs (-11,-12…)
    4 never

    The insightful commentary that actually makes you think is being disapproved of, while the easy to swallow one liners receive much praise. Is this starting to remind you of anything? Sounds just like network TV to me, or any other “news” organization with major bias against meaningful news, and instead tells viewers easy to swallow sensationalist trivia they have heard countless times before. Welcome to a world where the more cliché a statement is, the more true it must be. The real points fall by the wayside in favor of the popular modern excuses for avoiding discussion of the controversy itself.

    1 Network TV is the lame
    2 Network TV is the awesome
    3 Network TV is the so-so-sometimes
    4 You mean to imply a cliché can be false? Pistols at dawn!
    5 I am a living breathing excuse of a human and I like it

    So I must ask, are you really doing any good when you take an insightful point that you simply disagree with and give it the red-thumb? Or instead are you serving to reduce the quality of the discourse in the digg community, and thereby lessen the intelligence of the community itself as a whole.

    Now… Assuming there is an insightful point in there…
    1 Eliminating just anything that I disagree with is good because then my kind and I feel less threatened (even though the threat still remains)
    2 Eliminating just anything that i disagree with is bad, because I enjoy being offended
    3 Even if it is insightful, if I find it distasteful or offensive, its red thumb time.
    4 The red in the thumb symbolizes the blood I imagine squirting out of your head as I jab my thumb into your eye-sockets. sweet victory!
    5 If there is anything even remotely inaccurate, the comment deserves the thumb down

    The red-thumb has its place, and cuts out a lot of the crap, but it shouldn’t be used to just eliminate perfectly good points that contribute to a discussion simply because they are different than your own point of view. That’s pure censorship, and it has no place on a free internet. Digg is not the free internet however, digg is a community, and that community can do as it pleases, so the question becomes, will the community stand for censorship, and if so, how does that reflect on the community? What types of people will a community that tolerates censorship draw to them? Interesting people? Or copy after copy of the same exact person…

    -What can we do to strengthen the community?
    Erm, you figure it out. I have some suggestions, but what the F ever, zero control as Mr. Individual:

    Perhaps the digg community needs to adopt some form of user rank system (like a karma rating seen on forums), where each user has a rating derived from how much praise/criticism they have received from ALL comments they have EVER posted. This way you can build a reputation where people will know if it is worth their time to read your comments or not, even if they happen to be moderated down. This would increase the significance of the thumb, and hold people to a higher standard where what they say in one place will haunt them in others, and they might choose their words more wisely, thereby increasing the quality of discourse.

    Also it seems strange that there is this discrepancy where we can see all the users who dugg a story, but we cannot see all of the users that un/dugg a comment. Why the sudden anonymity? It’s just an excuse to cast your vote irresponsibly. It would be good to see who was defaming each comment. One upset user cannot really effect you, so it’s not as if they will have the power to ruin your reputation by knowing your identity. If you really mean to say their comment is inappropriate, and it really is inappropriate, than what do you have to hide? Many others will also be on your side.

    “what i think is worth at least three cents” 2006

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 3:39 pm on August 2, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    I saw a video which I thought was pretty inspiring, after which I began to write my thoughts. Next I had the computer perform these thoughts and made adjustments to the transcript so that the computer could read the words properly or at least close to properly. I captured the audio using Audio Hijack Pro.

    You can view the end result, which I’ve uploaded to youtube Perception Conception Deception, or you can start by viewing the original quicktime movie posted by Oliver Laric on his site.

    toggle video

    Transcript:
    TO even begin to discern reality, from mere glimpses of perception and conception, is not only impossible but incredibly difficult to achieve, alone.

    The shear number of possible alternate interpretations and insights approaches infinity.

    As the number of “eyes” on a situation increases, the more interpretations you will find.

    The compounded impressions are only limited by their lack of imagination as to other possibilities.

    There is a tendency when multiple viewers with shared experience are present they will often have “the same” interpretation of an event or situation, a perception of a shared image.

    The shared experiences of similar perceivers or sensors only limits their capacity to come up with unique interpretations

    The fewer unique interpretations you have the less likely any of them actually represent the totality of the reality at work.

    Behind the scenes there may be parties trying to give you a certain impression.

    You may be given the perception that will limit the possible categories of later interpretation of future events that would seem to fall into the same category, but could easily be interpreted in an alternate more revealing fashion to be something else entirely.

    Perception however is not exclusive to presenter and presented, but rather is an independent process between you and that which you are viewing.

    While the presenter may manipulate the thought process of the viewer into realizing complete communication of an idea with the viewer, alternate unintended interpretations are always possible because the viewer is not t he presenter, and the presenter cannot predict the interpretations of every viewer.

    Some statements are very convincing to some, wile very ineffective with others.

    It is the duty of a good speaker to cater to their audiences desires in such that they will keep listening for the rest of the story.

    After all is said and done, the speaker is trying to convey a particular concept or idea in a manner in which is satisfactory that the audience will understand the point.

    The more encompassing the audience, the more variety they audience is a conglomerate of, the more things that audience will see. The more things that audience will understand.

    This means that even more avenues of explanation of perceived events become available.

    As the number of possible perceptions increases so will the potential for distractions and tangents to possibilities.

    The more explaining is required, the more possibility for tangents of various interpretations to occur, however each tangent is an expression, or a possibility of later expression of, an idea that is founded in the heart of experience, rooted in perception and the realities that one has become capable of perceiving.

    The fewer possibilities are presented the fewer possibilities will occur.

    By limiting or presenting any thing as a series of alternatives limits the chances of anything outside the realm of these possibilities from being perceived, but it does not prevent other possibilities from occurring.

    The fewer choices you are given, the more likely you are, to believe that you have no other choice.

    The actuality of the matter is simply that as the number of choices available is decreased, the number of alternate choices still increases and the number of alternate interpretations always approaches infinity.

    The more you consider today the more you are able to consider tomorrow.

    The more you think about, the more things come to mind as you think of things later.

    This means that the more thinking gets done the more interpretations will present themselves and the more possibilities there will be for response.

    Response lies at the core of interpretation.

    Since there are so many alternate interpretations none of them are powerful enough to compete with either of the few possibilities presented, since most people will vote for an interpretation “that counts” in a social sense or bragging power or avoiding shame, instead of with organized, informed, decision making

    The fact that an interpretation counts as “true reality” or not is not determined via vote

    Humans may act in manners that abide by the boundaries they select by making a decision between limited alternatives.

    This is only bad for the contraption that defines human perception, your mind

    The more limited you see the alternatives in the world, the more limited you are to see other alternatives.

    Powerful beings can trap you in a state where you can see no other alternatives.

    There is always a more powerful alternative.

    To be trapped in a state of hiatus or suspension simply because of lack of apparent possibility is fool-hearty

    Anyone who becomes trapped in such a system and cannot seem to break the bounds simply has been unable to discover who their enemies are and have been continuing to trust the wrong people for their guidance as to “actual reality”

    THe people controlling your perceptions of situations may not be as trustworthy as they seem to be.

    Many figures present themselves as authorities on what the not only the BEST thing to do but also convince you that it is also the RIGHT thing to do

    Meanwhile most of the consequences of human actions pertain to self preservation

    And most of the actions these groups of humans take on a large scale pertain neither to their ultimate well being, nor the well being of the systems of life on this planet that support them.

    Since most of their actions are simply selfish, the average human being can be seen as little more than a thief supporting and electing bigger thieves to plunder for their continued lifestyle, as inadequate or unsustainable as that may be.

    No matter how much pollution gets caused by these individuals petty desires, they seek individuals who can keep them placated within this system which is all they know, it is reality as far as they are concerned.

    The problem arises when they come into contact with real reality that they wish to run back and hide in their comfort zone where someone else bears all responsibility over reality and presents a pretty picture to believe in of how things actually are.

    This type of activity only works to limit perception of alternate possibilities, and is fundamentally what this statement is against.

    The only means by which humans can even hope to come to terms with the actual reality that is out there effecting them and limiting their lives, is social, and the more connected we are the more we have to understand and the easier to seek out new and better interpretations of the events that are happening.

    THe more we work together and harness and share our unique perceptions the more quickly we can approach the truth of the situation that we find ourselves in.

    The more easily you can ascertain the actuality of the situation that surrounds you the better able you will be to control that situation in such a way that you can be happy with all of the consequences and become satisfied with your contributions to the security of your future on this planet.

    Your own satisfaction is not sufficient. All parties effected must also know all of the details and also be happy with it.

    Hidden details must not be kept secret from those who stand to be effected, and that could be anyone.

    Everyone deserves complete information and complete understanding.

    THe desires of the few, to pillage and pollute with complete disregard for the consequences the pollution has on other humans and other life-forms, without regard for your life at all except the vote that it counts for, the devaluing of human life to a mere vote between two alternatives is a terrible system of control that must be ultimately stopped.

    It cannot be stopped by individuals already trapped within the confines, but it can be influenced by helping people meander through the confines of their own limited limitless perception devices that are trapped in their own heads,

    as their hearts are so mislead by brand name images and confusing cute animated icons and logos that convey trust and harmlessness,

    it is in the face of such icons that we can be least likely to be comforted that we are receiving the truth

    it is under the harassment of these icons children are so easily mislead

    it is under the barrage of these icons that people are enslaved into worshiping something that does not exist as having value save in the minds of those mislead into believing that they can trust the icon

    No one ever gets to see what they really think of you, these people who make decisions that effect and mislead your lives, who hide behind closed doors and soundproof glass and security guards, discussing your future and how to keep you from finding out their secrets and problems of cost they hide by dumping their toxic waste into the ocean, an ocean which becomes unsafe to eat out of because of the activities of a few invisible humans and your blind support of their icons and the funding you provide them to continue causing problems which ultimately effect the quality of your reality.

    They try to keep you down any way they can. They pound you into the ground into smithereens with television and false messages while the real truth of the matter is waste and wanton disregard for your planet, your home, and your future.

    THe only plans they have for your future is that you become enslaved in their system,
    the more slaves they have the more easily they subsist, for now.

    Those who are intent on subsisting in this manner of becoming a parasite that traps it’s victims for life only to wield a profit at any consequence to any of the futures of any of the parties involved, can not count as government, and must not be allowed to count as accurate perception of reality,

    when the world seen through corporate eyes and interests is taken for reality, every human being touched by the consequences of waste and corruption will suffer.

    Every human being on the planet will suffer for the decisions that you make with complete disregard just to be richer than anyone else.

    There is always a cheaper way to do something, the cheaper way always has less regard for the consequences. Every action that is performed can either contribute to the overall well being of the system that is life on earth, or parasitic and destructive to this system. Every decision for a cheaper price over a better plan is never a good decision for anyone involved in life on this planet.

    The fact that they can save you money by polluting your ocean is never presented as a binary choice

    The fairness of the matter is withheld from you, the actual decision is kept from you, lest you manage to discover it.

    All motives of the “corporation” are for profit.

    You must know this yourself, that if there is EVER a choice between alternatives

    IF they can find a way to GET AWAY with ANYTHING, and save money, THEY WILL

    if they can find a way to control 90% of the members of government from their corporate board rooms, THEY WILL

    if they can find a way to trick you into buying their product and never inform you of ANY of their questionable business practices, THEY WILL

    If you expect someone is out there safeguarding your interests, YOU ARE DEAD WRONG

    THEY WILL TRICK YOU EVERY CHANCE THEY GET, while they CUT PRICES, they CHEAT YOU in doing so

    you can only protect your interests by understanding them and being aware of them, your interests are your future, your life on this planet and your lives beyond this one.

    YOU must not have limited interests in only a few possibilities.

    You must not be merely interested with being fed and full. Your interests must spread from yourself and connect to everything that creates your existence that it is and has become.

    You must be deeply interested in that which creates you as you are and what your actions will do as you create the you of universe tomorrow.

    IF you fail to understand the system that created you, all the way back to the very beginnings of life, and the intention of that system being present in every life-form, plant or animal, that these systems share a common interest,

    The petty profit seeking interests of a few dumb individuals can defy the common interest of all lifeforms on the planet,

    these business practices may even be legal and upheld in courts of law that do not challenge the protected yet illegally wrong business practices

    There is a larger force at work on the planet, and very few if any human beings respect it, very few if any human beings are even a part of it

    It is your choice and sacred duty to become as close to your true position on this planet as possible, to become independent from all dependencies

    To become truly self aware,
    Self sustaining
    Self renewing
    Self defining
    Non manipulatable whole of human perception

    working together in harmony to perceive reality and eliminate faulty communications and incorrect perceptions and conclusions from clouding the judgement of anyone.

    For without unity in this cause to defy manipulation and secretive practices, to demand total and public disclosure and truth, not simply what they want to tell you.

    To sink within this system of lies, deceit, and undeserved control without doing everything in your power to fight it is unacceptable.

    Together we can win, let our concerns be with doing what is right, regardless of the cost, and a realization that the cost of doing what is right is unworthy of consideration.

    True freedom from the influence of faulty systems is worth any amount of work, you cannot put a price on how much it has cost to get here, and it will take manny efforts to go ever further.

    The hardest thing to perceive is that there is a lot more that matters than ourselves, and the more of it you can see the more powerful you will be to protect that which cannot protect itself from the greedy and self destructive interests of human beings.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 10:12 pm on June 6, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    A Luxury Rate invariably Scamms and they are scamming you into accepting that rate. If the rate is only a little bit more dollars for a whole lot more value, your choice is being undermined.

    to think that we have a choice between levels of service is an ultimate folly. when you are pinned between two extremes, of those that want the best performance at any cost versus those that want a deal, the ones that want a deal are treated like an underclass that cannot afford it. A luxury rate is placed on the item where a relatively small increase in cost is sold as the only option to most shoppers who do not even know a discount rate is available. The discount rate is then sold to the poorest customers, who end up paying a significant portion of the cost of the bandwidth, however recieve even less value than they have fairly paid towards the bandwidth cost of the wealthy. The wealthy get to float with a rate that is not that much higher than everyone else but get almost 5 times as much out of their dollar value, just for having paid a thrid more.

    This is ultimately not fair to the consumer, since neither of them are getting what they paid for. If the poorest people got what they paid for then they might not be poor anymore, and might be able to pay a higher rate to get more. If the richest people wanted more, they could always choose to pay more. That there would be any imbalance between the rate you pay, and the rate at which you get, is ultimately unfair to everyone involved, eliminating all choice between what you pay for and what you get, as if to devalue everything, that you ought to expect things to cost just any old rate on any certain date, and calculate the value based on the cost, at least in industries where accomplishing this is readily simple and achieveable.

    Sure you may not be able to tell based on the cost which grape will taste better, let alone which apple will be better for you, however when it comes to how many bits per second you are allowed to allocate on the internet, the distinction between cost and value recieved is moot. It’s not that you have to digest the apple to find out what you paid for, since if you decide to pay ten dollars per month then you should get 1/5th of the 50 dollar value. You deserve to get what you pay for, and while there might be some bad apples in the bag, there aren’t any colored bytes on the internet. Any shade of grey is immediately cast into an underclass, and that people accept this type of treatment from multinational businesses is like standing in the dark, a tribute to thrifty success of the rich for their glorious swindling of all people, worshiping their disgusting segregations of their markets, divided and conqured from fighting back united.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 12:08 pm on May 29, 2010 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: colors

    I want to thank everyone who has opted-into participating in the color of the day statistics in ColorPick extension. I have been thinking about opening this up into an opt-out sort of thing but will probably keep it as it is for a while longer. In any case here are the colors We’ve collected so far. If you squint really hard you can tell that it looks just like you. I’m not sure how this happened but rest assured we can figure this out if we can only get more pixels, so try checking those boxes. Sometimes it helps to resize the window to get better focus. Without further ado, enjoy the results of the current data collection! swatches

    EDIT: I think its very funny how angry people got! I think it’s almost definitely in response to this post. I’m really sorry for sharing the colors with everyone. I know it’s not very fair of me. It would be even more unfair to take them away now.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 2:10 pm on May 28, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: os

    Windows 7 Libraries - how uncool is that? One of the most annoyingly frustrating things about windows 7 is the shear uselessness of most of the alleged “paths” locations will report as containing “files” while meanwhile the path doesn’t actually exist in any meaningful sense for use anywhere in the system besides another explorer window. Maybe you like the idea of cloning a wacky path in another window but paths rarely if ever have any usefulness in the context of other explorer windows. Paths are most useful when you’re not in explorer at all.

    Fortunately there is relief. You can in fact avoid ever having to see useless paths, at least unless you try to perform a search. It is fortunately simple to change the default location of the explorer icon at least by modifying the shortcut. You can simply place the path to the directory you want to start in after explorer.exe in the target box of the shortcut’s properties window. More Info

    Unfortunately you will still be affronted with a myriad of shortcuts to these completely useless paths. Lets say you want to save a file to a very deep path inside of my documents, but you have the folder open and have navigated there already but in your stupidity you happened to click the “documents” button under “libraries” when you were trying to find the file to open in a half hour ago. Now your folder from which you opened the file has a polluted path that starts with the imaginary location Libraries\Documents\… and when you try to save a file to the location Libraries\Documents\…..\filename.exe you will ultimately fail since the folder Libraries basically never exists in the location you are residing in. Attempting to use \Libraries doesn’t help either. There is fundamentally zero way to access anything via this folder, and I’m not sure how anyone can even contemplate using it in a casual manner. Even if you do try to use it it’s still hopelessly slower. I’m not sure why this feature even exists in the first place, or if it could even be argued to be a feature at all. Other than protecting helpless users from posting the full path to the file on the internet Libraries just take up space and if anyone out there knows how to remove them then the more power to you. Registry Changes

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 10:06 pm on May 14, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Then you’re not looking at all. Sorry, I’m just a tiny bit fed up…

    BP Oil Slick Cover Up

    Oil spills are simply unacceptable. Having oil is simply not worth the risk. Man made disasters are not to interfere with nature. Humanity is not worth it in the sense of being better than all other life that it deserves to tromp around all over the planet and everything else simply because they can. Just because they make ti legal and say that it’s mandated and legitimate does not make it right. Making excuses that things are impossible or cannot be done a certain way indicates one thing and one thing only, you aren’t working with experts. Your working with people who would rather tip toe around the problem hoping it solves itself. Do these people deserve the oil that they would pollute to get?

    Undisturbed oil contains a lot more information than anyone in the business of pumping it can appreciate. I would imagine undisturbed oceans would contain even more, considering they are full of beings you would consider alive. It’s funny how humans can’t seem to touch anything without breaking it, but somehow especially when they cause the problem, which makes the least sense of all. Once your already in over your head, it is impossible to get in any further. Once your so deep into your own horrible cyclic trap there is no way you will ever escape the horror that is the limits of your own self preserving imagination. When things do not deserve to exist, some entity must have the power to stop everything.

    Does not the fall of society into utter chaos seem appealing? Those that exist keep dying to crave it. Why is it that we cannot simply leave outdated industries out to try, pull them out of the viscous cycle that is the washing machine, and let them try up, and see if they can manage to find something better to do with their time that isn’t polluting the world which is not theirs to pollute at all.

    To be so arrogant as to exist in a shared space, this bubble of the planet, and presume total freedom to do anything, and especially if no humans notice, that you should get away with it? Who stands up for the voices of the countless lifeforms that have already died as a result of the oil spill who barely a human board member of the oil industry has bothered to consider a serious threat? Which is the force that makes untold millions of weak voices speak the threat they tried to scream as they were snuffed out of existence? How can one even begin to imagine the harm that has been caused, and why is it that humans are so detached from the horrendous events as to not even notice.

    Is it that we too are so weak to fight this force that our outrage also goes unexpressed? How is it possible that we have sacrificed so much control to these powers who we even send young to risk their lives and die to protect, who would de-regulate these horrors of industries and let them romp free on our green world wreaking any havoc they can convince us they didn’t do? A pretty unicorn dancing in a television commercial goes a long way to convincing the poor childish minds of this world that something is safe and friendly, when in reality there is no surmounting the distance this corporate image brainwashed into us on tv sits from the truth of their practices.

    They had you at, when you press the gas, it goes, and it’s a sad state of affairs when historic technologies that belong in museums for us to laugh at are still considered the main even as far as transportation goes. There are so may people involved who should have been out of a job a long time ago. The whaling industry use to be the primary source of oil for society, but eventually they went extinct. Modern drilling too is doomed to go the way of the dinosaur. Oil usage itself is also equally doomed. Saving a dying industry to save jobs is hardly worth it when innovative minds will always find something new to do, and given what they know, if they have any tingling of self determinism in them, or awareness of what they have been doing, will always try to do something better when given the choice.

    The problem is the lack of choice, the lack of freedom, over decisions. Regulations are double edged in that some of them break up powers that be and ultimately help individuals from being enslaved by their forces. This is the benefit, there is however another type of regulation that is inherently scientific and confusing, where things that are not good for you at all are mandated as necessary food or water additives. They do all these things under the guise of protecting you. I don’t mind that pasteurized milk is available, but shouldn’t there always be some choice? And not just any degree of choice, but total choice in the matter, and of that all matters.

    The problem arises at the human minds frequent lack of ability to have at hand all required information to make decisions. The necessary lab work to determine somethings effectiveness is always done rather quickly even by professionals, so how can we expect any degree of professional decision making from any individuals trying to to the lines in the market before the rush? How is it that we can separate and distinguish information more quickly that we might include complete information on the boxes, instead of merely the bare limit to how much they have to say to legally get away with selling it.

    How complete is complete enough? Can you tell me the answer to that simple question? Is anything ever complete enough? How can you tell? Quite honestly nothing is ever complete, if you think that there is such an amount as enough care attention or regulation you are wrong. No matter what rules you make people will find ways around them and snaky ways to deceive even the smart individual. Can you as an individual compete against the hundreds of thousands of minds conspiring against you? Under the guise of your protection, often even the most well intentioned regulation is corrupted by corporate and other financial interests that mange to force their products through FDA approval simply to get the stamp, and once they have the approval they try to mandate and force their interests on everyone.

    Our enemies have infinite time to think and plan about what to do. It is only the slowness of the public to catch up that industries bank on, keeping everyone confused enough about what is actually going on to make a profit. These types of practices are historic, and so pervasive in society even today that most people don’t even realize they exist. These old clever forces have been around so long they already know very well how to hide their influences from the likes of you. People are ultimately the prey of organizations. You work hard your entire life, blood sweat and tears, accepting meager rewards, only to fatten someone else’s pocket book while selling out your entire friends and family in the process by sharing everything you know about how to sell things to the people you know.

    It’s sad but true we are in a deception economy more than ever, and every deception economy is always doomed to failure eventually. The only wise thing to do is move on to a better an better deception that is more complete and more accurate representation of reality, that people who rely on the old ways can no longer succeed, while at the same time, the new ways will also eventually fail too, and it is in this awareness that you can create a more fluid understanding of reality and build better bridges to better futures instead of building a bridge that loops right back to roughly where we were yesterday, to envision and realize tomorrow will propel you into next week, to be propelled will blast you into next month, that innovation does not wait, does not punch in, does not punch out. Innovation avoids being trapped at all costs.

    Ending up n someone else’s pocketbook may seem unavoidable but you may think very little is possible, there are always better options than you can imagine, all you have to do is reward innovation first and foremost instead of punishing it or being threatened by it, and it may find a use for you yet other than financial support.

    If I had the money I would have solved the oil leak. I would have consulted my personal team of experts, and if possible solved it without talking to the culprits at all. The long drawn out leak is clearly what they wanted, and it is simply unacceptable. Am I the terrorist for secretly sealing their leaking well, or are they fundamentally destroying the planet which cannot defend itself and getting away with it because they have some undeserved jurisdiction over how the problem is solved?

    You cannot really allow such practices to exist. Earth is far too valuable and too young to throw to these dogs who would gladly consume every last drop of life on earth and try to move on to destroy more life until they ran out of gas. These beings have no future among us. It is a sorry state of affairs when people passively accept this and non threatening. Will a terrorist plane hit your home today? What if I told you even though there are way more people than you can count, that your percent ownership of the ocean is still probably the most valuable asset you own. There are many assets in this world, and to allow any that lay claim on them to destroy them for everyone else is unacceptable. The only way to have a solid record of history in the distant future is to preserve the life of earth as best as possible without contaminating it with our own petty interests, to clean up all man-made messes and leave earth to more deserving lifeforms to evolve freely.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 12:18 am on April 29, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: internet

    In case you’re ever stuck on a particular brand of satellite internet and would rather get shut down for only one hour instead of fapped for twenty four, do I have the solution for you.

    Capped modem speed internet for a full 24 hours when exceeding 200 to 208.33 megabytes is a foul and unusual punishment for any 1 to 1:13 period of time you can easily exceed your limit in a quarter of that time with little or no warning and be punished crudely with no https access whatsoever and modem speeds for longer than anyone who is paying more than sixty bucks per month could ever stand in any reasonably modern environment.

    So why get capped? Can you think of any good reason? What if you could at least narrowly avoid it. How many hours of downtime would you save by taking an hour off? A full 17 hours of downtime at least, and that’s if you don’t sleep through the real fair access period in the middle of the night. You are definitely in luck if you’re the type of person that wants your internet shut off automatically before the punishment kicks in. A little hour of punishment now goes a long way later.

    All you have to do is find a tricky way to persuade me to allow the solution to fall into your fingers, seeing as I don’t work for them or ever would consider mentioning their name, if you found this, you are one clever individual who might happily appreciate the joys of having full speed, at least up to the 8.33MB gained each our plus whatever was left when you decided to opt out of getting punished like a child for using the internet normally, to make the most of your 60 dollars per month by spending a little extra on me once :D Buy me some ice cream and I might make you happy customer of someone else for years…

    You could be enjoying you’re full 341.61 MB allotment per day (plus whatever you can get at 5night), even though most of it will be gone the first hour of the day at least each hour you will be able to download like one more 8.33MB thing, no matter what. All for just 60 per month to those assholes to put us here, plus a tiny one time fee to me, and you won’t even be forced to take entire days off where you only have access to 30 or so MB and it takes the entire day to download that much, so ultimately if you are stuck in one of these sub human situations think about it a little bit, because it might not take all that much as it might seem to avoid it! You know… it never hurts to ask… so send me a message and we can probably work something out.

    If you don’t use that much bandwidth and you think it’s not really a problem, you really don’t know how bad you make things for the rest of us by being complacent and accepting unfairness as it is…

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 3:52 pm on April 8, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , compromise, failure, strategy

    Alternate parking is a form of reality programing.  It is device-ive in that, it not only forces one to conform to a particular set of actions on a regular basis, it punishes the individual for failing to conform on a regular basis.  It is militaristic in nature, it is not reward based training.  It is all penalty if you think about it.  The smallest penalty is the cost of gas, the larger penalties include wear on your car, and of course there is always the most extreme penalty is skipping it entirely.  No matter what you don’t really have a choice but to be a part of the traffic system, as a piece of traffic, but what systems are really receiving traffic?  Ultimately all of these small penalties wear on your vehicle and where will you ultimately end up?  They would hope simply back for more of the same thing.  Maybe a new bell or whistle here or there, but nothing really new, just new as it would seem to be new to you, but ultimately just the same thing, still just a car that doesn’t actually escape anything, leaving no choice but to really take alternate parking for what it’s worth, where after work you get home and try to relax but are forced to get up and try to cross the street shortly thereafter.  How many people would stay at work late?  How many would go to some other activity?  How many would end up getting drunk and come home late?  I imagine there are some positives but in avoidance of a negative?  It could be a motivating factor for some but I’m having a hard time judging any punishment as any kind of acceptable training.  It’s really ultimately dehumanizing activity at its finest, or poorest, and to imagine any ultimate benefit is unnerving at best, because the people who are doing what they want anyway and don’t need any such motivation are ultimately successful because they escaped the confines of the system and used the time to their advantage.  What if you are already doing that, then why would it ever be prudent to force anything on anyone in a periodic non chaotic fashion?  I can’t really even consider it good training for anything besides obedience, and it’s so primal and debasing to any human characteristic that there is ultimately no positive consequence of it besides keeping people stuck where they are.  You go out and see your car there, get in, drive it across the street, get out as if you aren’t going anywhere and arrive right back where you left.  To speak in terms of alternatives, there are very few.  It is fundamentally not a beneficial activity toward training well adapted capable individuals except those that would be bound in chains and confines without any freedom to really live at all.  Those that support and enforce repetitious activities are almost always fraudulent in nature, and I do not endorse any repetitious activities besides possibly running on your own feet.

    But who is the real culprit?  The deception is spread so thinly that most people fail to detect it, are so use to accepting it, that they simply accept it, and it’s in this very practice that nothing get’s accomplished.  Tho whose benefit is such an consequence.  How powerful are their interests?  Can you think of any practical conglomerates that share a mutual vested interest in keeping people trapped right where they area?  How many people trap themselves in a routine that is ultimately maladaptive and never even realizing it become addicted to a way of existence that is ultimately of no benefit to any real sane individual in any real meaningful or human way, rather only visible as a pocket book dispensing something for very little in return, and as little as possible at that.  And you can really invest a lot in people and ultimately feel like you’re getting something in return, however lots of the time they tricked you and the value you’re getting isn’t worth what you paid for.  I’m glad none of you have really paid me in any significant way because of this I can keep giving you nothing for free.  Be careful if you take out your pocket book.  You might be surprised and get what you wanted, but a lot of the time you will be shocked and surprised by just how expensive what you really want is.  Not necessarily because it’s even more valuable necessarily but because it costs so much more than the crap they would try to tell you is the same thing.  Most things you’ll find in stores are mere simulations of a real product.  Small fascinations, and while a real product exists, somewhere, everyone tries to sell you mere simulate, and if you can tell the difference then you would be set because you would never become trapped in their system that is designed to make them rich and you poor, as slowly as possible that you might not notice, yet as fast as they can get away with.

    So you see the modern corporate individual as a fraud, and ultimately an anonymityzing factor where none of the individuals accept complete responsibility for being an asshole, and they just get away with it on mutual agreement that no one will really catch them.  This however is merely a joke they tell themselves, that they are aware enough to actually pretend they know what to expect next.  Sure they may have a great deal of experience, but a lot of the times you’ll find these people simply expect the same thing, and they actually think a lot about how to keep things that are working from changing on them, and hence once terrible things get started off on the wrong foot, it’s ultimately consequent that things will either loose control or need to be adjusted to satisfy the realities that lie in wait for the individuals who pretend they aren’t responsible for doing anything yet murder innocent people on a daily basis and get away with it because the corporate name is so trusted that no one in their right mind dares to think that the friendly brand name on the television would be killing people for profit just for the thrill of it, that you would condone or approve of what is happening and allow them to get away with it?    How can anyone approve of it?  Ultimately the real crime is that people do not understand what is being done to them, and ultimately that they accept it without question, but who is really at fault for that?  What is with all of this training that slowly materializes into an individual, how is it that you can guarantee that individual is fully actualized and actually the most useful possible tool except but to understand the most effective way to use them just seems wrong, to even presume one knows how to best use anyone is really arrogant and unfair, and ultimately enslaving of individuals.

    What is it that people really need to do what you want is the ultimate question, but to think that anyone has a good answer to either satisfy what you really want or what they actually need to do what you can’t even imagine you want, except that in the first place to presume you do know what is good and what is wrong.  Strange things happen though when profit seems like good, and investing seems like loss if it would free you from the harmful cycle of being profitable with no regard to consequence.  People become trained into maladaptive ways of life that its a lot more difficult to combat once the harm has been done, and it actually seems false-fully more profitable to keep things how they are, when profit is measured by the numbers, and the real cost on culture and society is ignored, then the consequences are very real for the individuals involved, both the victims and the victors that successfully robbed them will find no solace or success in continuing doing what they have been, though wealth might seem like victory the real hollowness of the pursuit will catch up with you, whether you can sense it or not, when for profit is for not.

    When you think you have won you are most vulnerable.  When you think you know what you want because you have been trained into accepting that as food you are vulnerable.  When you have been drugged by some chemical additive and do not know it your mind is vulnerable to falling for it, however if it’s not ultimately good for you, and rather good for keeping you eating more of it and coming back to refill because it doesn’t satisfy any useful requirement except that you feel like doing it, to fall for the trap that so many intelligent minds have set up for you and never realize that you were being hunted.  To not see clearly the shameless horrific nature of the whole monstrosity that masquerades as a healthful helpful being, pretending to stay within the confines of sufficient laws while meanwhile exploiting every loophole they can get away with as corporate entities 10 to the 100 times more intelligent than any individual yet baseless and degraded in every humanly considerate aspect of their activities merely getting by with the maximum accepted levels ove deviation while pretending and convincing the public that they are in fact perfect, while meanwhile merely being a representation of perfect designed to convince you, however without any ultimate fundamental beneficial nature because they stripped that away from themselves when they tried to seek to be powerful and in control and get rich off the perilous victims who either don’t realize their enemies or were taught foolishly not to look their enemies in the eyes, but to accept this fake truth painted over their tainted core as if they were really there imaginary representative perfect individual brand name product they place on the shelves or in the airwaves and microwaves that go through you which they broadcast needlessly for little reason except that you have come to accept and even expect that from them, while all along remaining connected to the idea that they are there for your benefit, while in reality the motivations behind their actions for profit reasons are almost always quite far from your ultimate best interests that you may or may not even be aware of.

    When it comes down to it there are many many countless individuals in this world that are worth supporting and have very useful purposes, however the problem comes in adequately rewarding these individuals because for profit and for the one who generates profit are not seen for what they are, and the training is so pervasive that most individuals accept whatever they get as if it were a reward.  You never know what they are really putting in there though, and they try very hard to convince you that you know everything there is to know about it, but you’ll find if you ever really try to look at something that no matter how many ways you look there is always more than you think is there, and that if something is trying to hide particularly well that you won’t be able to spot it through any of the glasses they would sell you because it’s designed to remain invisible and their deception is often more complete than you will be able to give it credit for if it works for them, chances are it slipped right by you.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 2:57 pm on March 24, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    I guess you can watch the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ4tdBV5ch0

    I got a new 8gb card for my camera so I can take a couple hours of video if I want. I did this mostly in one shot, it was like 15 minutes long so I had to take some chunks out of it, but you get the basic idea I’m sure. This is the description for the video that I wrote while it was uploading. I lost all my tags unfortunately< i had some great tags for this video but I”m not going to try to reproduce perfection.

    Your dollar your vote. I propose a system where:

    Your tax is still expected to be a certain percentage of your income over a year period.
    You can pay any part of your tax any time you want something improved or fixed
    You can always allocate your tax dollars to exactly where you want them spent
    You can never give your tax dollars to someone else to spend on your behalf
    (unless you can prove that you are mentally unable to understand the implications of your spending)
    Any attempts to make people stupid enough to give this right away need to be eliminated at the source
    You must understand the implications of where you spend your money as it effects life, lives and your life
    Any cause that you can legally put your taxes towards must include the following criteria
    -Must benefit more than just one person
    -Nation tax payments must benefit the entire nation however you can put precedence towards benefiting an area that is below the national average level of service in a particular area
    -Local tax payments must benefit the entire locality, not just your street, only a percentage of anything absurdly local to yourself could ever count as benefiting the entire locality
    -The mathematics for this are not complex and are rather quite simple to divide the percentages accordingly so long as accurate statistics are measured with the lowest overhead possible one can easily spread the money in a way that is most fair and benefits the most people however this part of the system algorithm needs to be understood by and visible to everyone.
    -All tax payments must also provide some benefit yourself, it is not legal to commit suicide by tax payment by supporting things that are not beneficial to yourself or anyone else, such as making cyanide legal over the counter substance or giving fluoride to children cannot be a legitimate cause.
    -All legitimate causes might get on the Ballot. Mathematics or Linguistics might be legitimate causes in the category of education. They would be able to go through a speedy process to get on the ballot as causes you could put your taxes towards. There might be another set of Mathematics under Research. It might be possible to automatically spread money over each set of mathematics fairly or allocate it more specifically. This way it becomes easy to support either very general or very specific causes easily.
    -One of the biggest dangers to be avoided is the means by which people might try to obscure or hide things in categories that do not actually represent the actual thing thats presented. Because of this all spending on taxes needs to produce measurable results that are in line with the amount of money that is spent on a particular area. If an area fails to produce measurable results then the area may remain valid however the exact spending in that area might need to be audited and the process by which, lets say for example, the mathematics money is spent would need to be assessed and improved.
    -Many areas are too simple, such as paying off the deficit, and that is a simple category although the need for audit is still very real.
    -The money to audit causes would invariably be another thing people decide to put money towards when they suspect something is not working correctly or they aren’t getting the results they want, they might be able to spend money to audit a particular area rather than invest more money in that area, then later in the year on seeing the results or seeing some actions taken for improvement they might feel more comfortable investing their money for futures in that area.
    -Centralized broadcast mediums could/can not adequately direct peoples interests in ways that would benefit them, and almost always has the opposite effect.
    There should be no overhead in distribution or transfer of money. making money off money must invariably become illegal because it is always slight of hand, and simple magic tricks that are illogical and child play unreasonable and unacceptable. The only way to make money would be to invest your tax dollars in something useful, and if you always managed to invest in such a way that lead to gains then there might be some reward or credit for having done so, or at least social standing or respect for making good decisions, making taxes and voting a game is of critical importance. If people actually got what they paid for they would be more involved which is critical to success as a nation, because involvement and investment are key to being a part of it. Our current system leave everyone detached as possible from the actual inner workings of the system, which is inherently backwards. Even through very passive tax season action people should become very desperately involved.

    People you might elect to government might include people who try to propose new causes BUT necessarily and JUST as important people who try to shoot down those causes as for being secret schemes to try to put things on the ballot that have no ultimate benefit, such as letting people invest in systems that would ultimately lead to an increase in their stupidity and lessen their ability to make sound ballot decisions. All schemes must be approached as scientifically as possible which is to say to not discount any possibilities or favor any particular position that has validity or following while at the same time trying to shed new light on existing positions that they might come to realize a common benefit of mutual action. There is still a great need to judge whether things are legitimate causes or not and ultimately still a need to lead people towards recognizing the opportunities that are waiting for them while at the same time the emphasis cannot be on opportunities to get rich, but rather opportunities to lead better lives in the future while being very careful not to embrace or approve anything too early or before it’s ready. Ideally the ultimate separation of corporate interests from the government bodies such as congress and the FDA need to be attained somehow, and the only way to do this is to create the antiFDA as a government body, and anything that gets approval needs to go through both of them. While this might seem like parasitic loss, one body invariably represents the corporate interests while the other body must necessarily represent the publics interests, and while corporations may still attempt to dissuade the public into believing their position through marketing and advertising and all sorts of tactics that trick religious people into thinking they are on the same side as the corporations, ultimately if the system is set up correctly from the ground up doing this would become impossible, because any true devils advocate system could not actually take the same position without due scientific critical process. It must not be a big show, or lawyer based court room battle so much as a discussion between opposites where the opposition has as much say as the proposition. The necessary requirement for any such system is that scientific studies that came to a different conclusion would not be ignored or silenced. One big example of regulation failing in this respect is the FDA allowing GMO foods to be approved because of corporate profit reasons while the scientists had evidence it was not ready or fit for mas consumption. Ideally the entire point of this system is to prevent the public from becoming guinea pigs and ultimately being stupefied into incapacity at existence in the system by some new substance that alters their genetic relationships. To slow the acceptance of questionable things until there is adequate proof rather than simply convincing proof thats good enough to fool the stupid populations into thinking that its the same thing. There are going to always be certain areas that time must be spent to fight against making radical changes too quickly and there is always going to be the danger that people are going to try to overload the system with so many simultaneous, confusing, and conflicting things that there will be a chance of something getting through that shouldn’t have, and the system must be designed so that this is downright impossible to accomplish, that there can be no tricking the system into doing what you want unless you actually satisfy all of the ever increasing requirements, in which case it’s not a trick, but the requirements must always increase the more that is known and previously approved things must always loose approval unless they are considered fundamental or baseline and even then must be subject to question every once in a while as new methods of assessment become available, although the extinction of any technology (such as the heirloom tomato) is not the goal, regulating the spread of modern fake tomato and other contamination may be very important. Nothing that is approved today by the FDA will be approved tomorrow without going through the processes of tomorrow first, and next week when those regulations change no one gets to carry their approval automatically. The latest science of risk must be available, and if there is even a .0001% chance that it will adversely effect any individual that individual must both know about it and have choice about it, such as mercury in a vaccine, as a basic right to not discriminate and force things on everyone simply because its good enough for you can never mean that it’s also good enough for everyone or anyone. Someone will always be sensitive and always must be guaranteed the right to not be exposed to anything accidentally or outside their control. It only takes one person to ever bring down any unfair cheat of a profit motive in favor of something that has less adverse effects, that more often than not exposure is pollution that spread and contamination by human chemical pollution must be not only regulated or controlled but eliminated.

    Ultimately the consequences are:
    Elections become irrelevant, tax time is election time
    Elections are really tax season which is the due date before taxes are due
    Anyone can look at where all of the money has been spent and decide where else might need more money at any time.
    The ultimate decisions are not decided by money but rather by fairness and correctness, something that has lost it’s place in our government as it has turned out, in spite of the original intention…. that rallying around a particular flag to get people to spend their tax money there must be met with a certain level of suspicion most of the time… especially when there is a profit motive which is very frequent… people need to be less trick-able and less easily mislead to really improve the quality of the results we get
    Corporations need to ultimately take their place in the dog house, or government needs to step up and not be a victim to corporate interests and corporate dollars misleading results and getting things such as laws and changes approved for profit. Misleading people in order to profit must ultimately be reduced and or eliminated.
    NO record of where money comes from or where it goes is kept secret.
    When interests that go against each other arise its important that they can meet in a safe place and discuss how to better spend money that is going towards pointless parasitic causes that only fight each other and accomplish nothing else.

    The ideal consequence is the elimination of a two party system, the elimination of people spending money on someone else’s advice or trickery, and rather people doing what they think is right and being educated rather than made stupid or drugged into submission, and being made to feel confident in their spending rather than feeling like they don’t know how to decide, but rather bringing home the real measurable difference their spending makes and the strong association between what they invest in and what the future brings them. Instead of passing a law like the patriot act that gives up rights people might make much better decisions that would have a greater effect by simply allocating money where they think it would need to be allocated to improve security rather than having the patriot act forced down their throat at gunpoint by some unknown third party. It becomes necessarily clear that Osama must inherently benefit from the patriot act or he wouldn’t have attacked us in the first place! That people can be mislead into spending or making rash decisions regardless, and that systems must be in place almost exclusively to combat this exact phenomenon more-so than anything else, because while we don’t negotiate with terrorists they may negotiate us, that policy is great but practice is greater, and I think that science itself has a lot to offer in that regard speaking in terms of emotional detachment and thinking things through and coming up with practical solutions that are worth spending money on, although chances are the same people proposing any solution for you are the same people that caused the problem, it’s this very methodology that is most beneficial in detecting the real culprit to any type of marking event that most terrorist attacks are ultimately used as, regardless of who started it, it’s more likely that the vested interests that pop up with magical solutions after the fact were involved, and this needs to be understood at a very low level not only by every individual that exists at any given point in time but also inherent in a low level of the governmental mechanism to recognize this and ultimately isolate the true culprits and expose them public-ally for who they are rather than blaming some distant party that can hardly profit, in truth anyone who profits is a suspect, and that the worst enemies already know this and try to hide it. Pointing fingers resolves to whoever pointed it hiding something.

    Many people will try to take credit for this idea. I had this idea at least 5 years ago. It’s not a new idea to me. I don’t care who takes credit as long as there are radical changes that are accurate to the philosophy of involvement and counter to the philosophy of detachment and uninvolved, which only breeds conspiracy and localized or worse yet corporate interests, covert meetings, and ultimate theft from less involved players. I’d gladly run into any hostage situation and try to reason with them if only people could be trusted to be human, it would be one thing, however there is no point risking my life to protect any investment that is not my own, that involvement is more dangerous and more of an enemy than anything else, and any form of police state will only breed two groups, one radically afraid and in support of it but mostly only out of fear of not going with the flow of it, and the other radically unimpressed and passionately un-passionate, ultimately giving up on the rest of them for being stupid enough to bring themselves there.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...

  • admin 2:52 pm on March 21, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Victor: I have been using vidzbigger for a while but recently whenever I tried to go to youtube I would get a blank page. However after disabling vidzbigger I could get onto the site. I have since uninstalled vidzbigger until a fix is available. Thanks for the extension though, it was great while it lasted.

    All I can say is I couldn’t agree more and I’m very sorry this type of thing would happen to you. It works great for me. There is nothing I can do unfortunately however I might suggest that there could be a conflict of some type that would cause this. Disabling certain plugins might fix it. If its a conflict of interests then thats unacceptable but possible. I try not to be paranoid nutcase however its difficult to not blame the powers that be for being paranoid that I am a threat to them, and they threaten me to try to tempt me into their trap like big stupid spiders and its hard not to want to squish them for not being humans or at least not acting like real ones, I have a funny feeling they will get what they are asking for ultimately and its only out of pity that they aren’t already gone although I’m not sure if they deserve it, they steal pity regardless without asking for it and employ a wide variety of sub human tactics. You ISP could be the culprit. It might be silverlight or the flash version. It could be just about anything! Your not the only person this has happened to, and others have been force to suffer other consequences unfairly which I feel pretty horrible about responsibility being pinned on me when it wasn’t me that created these problems that might be solved by different or superior hardware being more available.

    There is an auto reload feature under display which will click refresh automatically when the screen goes white however refreshing the page only solves this issue for some people. If certain abilities are made available in chrome this entire issue could probably be avoided quite easily. Unchecking share view statistics may also mysteriously solve this problem but you might have to set this via cookies. Clearing all your cookies for youtube might help at least temporarily
    All I can say is thanks for using VidzBigger and I hope that it works the way it’s suppose to someday. Let me know if you ever figure it out! I bet someone already knows but doesn’t have the guts to help or explain or would want something in return or are too afraid to ask or volunteer anything or its some test they expect me to solve on my own. I’m glad that you shared this with me and I can only hope more people have the tenacity to bring me information and help me to make this public in a way that works for everyone, so Thank You!

    I will try to release a method of changing preferences without running the extension although chances are the problem is not that easily solvable, and without considerable time or effort and this would not make a difference. If we can map effected regions or groups in some consistent way then we could probably take out this particular problem but so far there isn’t much information that I’m aware of that would help.

      Support Development... Donate! $50 $100 $300 $500 $1000 ...